View Full Version : Pattycake???
fantor
4th August 2006, 08:21 AM
Hi:
Does anyone know if Pattycake has gone nude yet?? If not is her website worth $30.00 a month??
Thanks: Fantor
Sinner
4th August 2006, 09:09 AM
I've, seen her around on the net and think she is cute.
But, I doubt she went nude. Does, alot of tease stuff.
Where, she'll wear tight out fits and reveal some T\A.
Is,she worth $30.00? That depends on how much you like NN and tease modeling.
My opinion... I wouldn't bother shelling out $30.00 of hard earned money on her.
fantor
4th August 2006, 10:07 AM
I think she's the cutest thing and I have seen her sample pics all over the net, but there all the same old dozen or so sets. I haven't seen anything really new for the past few months. Are there any nude pics or vids of her out there, or anything new that has been released recently??
Thanks Again: Fantor
aBADfish
4th August 2006, 10:55 AM
She needs to go nude.
tntroy
4th August 2006, 11:04 AM
She needs to go nude.
Yup, shes one of the oldies whos been playing the NN/Teaser card a lil too long now. Her & Jen are about the only two left from way back who havent :eek:
Pop Not Soda
4th August 2006, 11:41 AM
Nude or not, $30/month is too much for any one girl.
OldSaltyDog
4th August 2006, 11:55 AM
I would have no problemo shelling out 30 measly beans for some nice pics of a girl that I thought was cute....thing with pattycake is, she's been around about as long as NNmodeling hit the 'Net, and I think she stopped updating years ago.
That's just the impression I get, I couldn't say for sure. But if you fancy having all of her pics, I'd say 30 smackers ain't too steep.
fantor
4th August 2006, 01:25 PM
Well after almost half a day of searching the best I could come up with was peachyforum.com. They have a 17 page post dedicated to Pattycake. Mostly all her old pic sets but toward the end of the post there is some newer pics I never seen before. She is defiantly hitting her early to mid twenty's. She has lost the little girl look, but replaced it with an older more mature one. I think she is hotter then ever. However, she needs to go nude. Little girl teen tease was fine when she was younger but now she needs to show her full developed beauty.
Fantor
fantor
4th August 2006, 01:30 PM
O yea... My bad her site is $24.95 per month not $30.00 I just checked it to make sure. Still to high IMO, if she droped it to $19.95 I just might join for a month or two to check it out.
Fantor
Ramsfan
14th August 2006, 01:18 AM
Anything above $20 for a NN site is way too much. Hell, I've found some very cheap nude/topless sites around for about $5 - $10.
Why are Nude/Topless sites cheaper than NN sites?
Doesn't make any sense. It's like going to a nudie bar and paying $10 for a topless dance and $20 for the girl to dance on you with her clothes on.
The Bloke
14th August 2006, 01:48 AM
Nude or not, $30/month is too much for any one girl.
Yeah...even if you're fucking her.....unless she does the laundry, too.
aeropilot
16th August 2006, 05:15 PM
OK, this post was a bit unfair. Let me shed some light on this if I may.
:stern:
First, if you wanna see the same type of model posing in skanky ass and pussy shots... the same thing over and over (a la phil-flash i.e., poor quality, lots of quantity, bad lighting) then there are tons of sites you can join for around $20. Pattycake starts at $19.95 but then the fee drops in price the longer you're a member. After less than a year I now pay under $16. Cool. I've joined many many sites over the last five or six years and, after all that time, hers is the only pay site that I am still a member of.
Second, Patty is one of the most sucessful models on the Net. She runs her site like a true business... you can practically set your watch by her updates... plus the time and care she puts into looking good (she's a licensed cosmetologist) and working with different photo shoot ideas makes her site more than interesting to check out on a regular basis. Of course you have to be a fan of extreme tease, but those of us who are into real erotica appreciate an approach like this (think Bettie Page, of which Pattycake may be the modern day equivalent). In her forum Patty has made it very clear that she doesn't really care about following NN guidelines and only shows what she is comfortable with. Will she ever go fully nude? No one knows, and that's part of the appeal. She's hooked her long-time members and we're always coming back for more.
Third, Patty's videos and photos *are* getting harder as she gets older and the site evolves. The domain will soon be changing to "Sexypattycake dot com" so we can only assume the content will be more daring too... she's been hinting for a while now and her most recent videos and webcams have been pretty hot compared to what she showed in the beginning...we'll just have to see how it all pans out.
Fourth, judging from all the requests I see on other forums for pirated Pattycake photos and videos, she is very very popular with a lot of people out there. I also see a lot of whining from those who can't afford the small fee every month to be a member. Jesus, shut up already... eat two fewer cheeseburgers a week and spend that money on her site membership for Pete's sake.
Of course different strokes for differernt folks and, if you need to see all the cookies to be totally happy, then God bless you and don't forget to take your zinc suppliments.
:groucho:
Deylin
16th August 2006, 07:25 PM
Aero made his points well, and I have to say it was done in a most unagressive manner... well, for the most part.
Yea, she retardulous hot...........
aeropilot
23rd August 2006, 03:25 PM
Aero made his points well, and I have to say it was done in a most unagressive manner... well, for the most part.
Yea, she retardulous hot...........
Uh huh. Sorry if I ruffled any feathers. It's just the sense of entitlement you all showed that made me comment... well, that and the incorrect information, but hey.
There's no reason Pattycake should go nude just to please you, she's quite successful doing pretty much the same thing (tho, to be fair, in ever-increasing boldness) for the past five years. If it's not enough for you then change the channel.
Apparently it's more than enough for many. The site's longevity, and its ability to still attract new members points to the fact that Patty's doing something right.
:cool:
bikeboy
23rd August 2006, 04:09 PM
I agree with all that aeropilot said. I wouldn't have been a member of her site for the last two of years if I wasn't completely satisfied. No she's not nude yet, but she's pushing it and is much more daring. The quality of her work is second to none and much thought and effort goes into each set and vid she puts out.
Ramsfan
24th August 2006, 01:12 AM
I think it has more to with the $$$ part than how far Patty goes in her pics. NN sites should NEVER cost more than nude sites.
fantor
25th August 2006, 08:40 AM
I agree Ramsfan
Buccy
25th August 2006, 08:45 AM
OK, this post was a bit unfair. Let me shed some light on this if I may.
:stern:
First, if you wanna see the same type of model posing in skanky ass and pussy shots... the same thing over and over (a la phil-flash i.e., poor quality, lots of quantity, bad lighting) then there are tons of sites you can join for around $20. Pattycake starts at $19.95 but then the fee drops in price the longer you're a member. After less than a year I now pay under $16. Cool. I've joined many many sites over the last five or six years and, after all that time, hers is the only pay site that I am still a member of.
Second, Patty is one of the most sucessful models on the Net. She runs her site like a true business... you can practically set your watch by her updates... plus the time and care she puts into looking good (she's a licensed cosmetologist) and working with different photo shoot ideas makes her site more than interesting to check out on a regular basis. Of course you have to be a fan of extreme tease, but those of us who are into real erotica appreciate an approach like this (think Bettie Page, of which Pattycake may be the modern day equivalent). In her forum Patty has made it very clear that she doesn't really care about following NN guidelines and only shows what she is comfortable with. Will she ever go fully nude? No one knows, and that's part of the appeal. She's hooked her long-time members and we're always coming back for more.
Third, Patty's videos and photos *are* getting harder as she gets older and the site evolves. The domain will soon be changing to "Sexypattycake dot com" so we can only assume the content will be more daring too... she's been hinting for a while now and her most recent videos and webcams have been pretty hot compared to what she showed in the beginning...we'll just have to see how it all pans out.
Fourth, judging from all the requests I see on other forums for pirated Pattycake photos and videos, she is very very popular with a lot of people out there. I also see a lot of whining from those who can't afford the small fee every month to be a member. Jesus, shut up already... eat two fewer cheeseburgers a week and spend that money on her site membership for Pete's sake.
Of course different strokes for differernt folks and, if you need to see all the cookies to be totally happy, then God bless you and don't forget to take your zinc suppliments.
:groucho:
I fully agree. I have saw ALOT of original stuff from her. I remember the Fairy one she did it was awesome. It had a black light and glow in teh dark paint on her body. It wasnt some thrown tgether bullshit you see all the time it was as full scale as you could get. Even the background looked like a Forest.
If your looking to look through a few pics and wank it, Patty is GOOD but just go with the Bend over king and shit photography of PhilFlash. If you want something more, Patty is probably there and there is a few others like FTV girls and DD girls. All do wonderful photography things and they do different things.
aeropilot
25th August 2006, 01:01 PM
I think it has more to with the $$$ part than how far Patty goes in her pics. NN sites should NEVER cost more than nude sites.
:rolleyes:
Well sure OK... but everyone's got a different limit to what they'll spend depending on their interest. The important thing to remember here is that Patty runs a private website... it's not part of Lightspeed or Triple-X Productions or Skanky Hoes That Show You Mo or any other corporate entity giving you, IMO, less for more. Just take Hailylittle for example... a corporate tease site with a very cute girl (she's blonde, naturally... has perfect teeth, a nice figure) but, on closer inspection, the same thing that can be found on many many other websites, costs $24.95 to join (more than PCO) and shows less!, WTF?... they never learn! It's like the "How many times can we feature the same vacuous, vapid, deer-in-the-headlights look model and get away with it" syndrome. Please, enough already. How much do you think they're paying that poor girl Hailey? I'll bet it's not much but just enough to keep her doing shoots.
Pattycakeonline can't be a $5 or $10 site because it has to turn a profit and isn't subsidised by similar material within the same company. Because Patty runs her own she keeps more... that's the incentive she has to keep trying different things and that, in turn, keeps her membership base up (pun intended!) and eager to check back regularly. Those facts may go over your head because... well, I don't really know so I can't say for sure but, for me anyway (and I can only speak for myself here), given the huge level of care AND real work that goes into Patty's site it's more than worth it to pay $15.95 a month to be a member... plus, as an art director, I love Patty's creative bent (not to mention the fact that she's also a smokin' Pocket Venus).
I think, in the end, that's the real difference that keeps her membership so loyal. If you don't see the value in her kind of eroticism then you have my sympathy (I suppose) but I won't loose any sleep over it.
Take care.
:cool:
Ramsfan
26th August 2006, 04:38 AM
The thing I find funny, is the constant bitching that I hear from people about models' shoots. What happened to people suggesting what they would like to see in photos? All I know is that I'll be suggesting tons of shit to the webmasters what I want to see.
fantor
26th August 2006, 08:30 PM
The Puddy man believes if the grasshopper becomes entangled in the furr, the puddy needs to be shaved..... Show the love hole...00)
fantor
26th August 2006, 08:41 PM
When I think of pattycake. My memories always fall back to the good O days of a young Tracy Lords....:-) Why??? you may ask!!! Well, "I" the Puddy man will tell you!!!
Jansom
26th August 2006, 08:41 PM
Alright. I don't follow Pattycake but I saw the grasshopper post and I had to read the whole thread.
My 2 cents: I see where everyone is coming from. My question is why does quality have to go down when more is shown. How about some high quality erotic hardcore work outside of certain studios.
Oh well, I think Fantor does have a point. Puddy is puddy however you dress it up. :yumyum:
fantor
26th August 2006, 08:47 PM
Jansom.... Thank you for your support. Welcome to the Puddy Legion. Only you and the true believers in Pattycakes puddy can bring about a puddy revolution. Miss Pattycake Tear Down That Wall!!!!!! Show the goods...00)
Thank You: Fantor
fantor
26th August 2006, 09:19 PM
The Puddy man agrees with Stewie Griffin!!!! Pattycakes need to be enjoyed by ALL....!!!!:;-)
fantor
26th August 2006, 09:35 PM
The end has come after a life long yearning for the one and true goddess of our hearts desire. She who has the torpedo tits of a goddess and the full growth bush of an 80's celebrity. The one we know as Traci Lords. Only through her purest brilliance can we come to appreciate the finite nature of her purity and position as the purest of mastubatory fantasys. Only now in the 21st century can such a title be passed to the new queen of mastubatory pleasure. She who we know as Pattycake. She who we know through her many erotic videos has formed a loyal following of self-pleasuring individuals of the highest caliber. :-)
P. S. We stil want to see what's behind door number one.
aeropilot
28th August 2006, 05:55 PM
The thing I find funny, is the constant bitching that I hear from people about models' shoots. What happened to people suggesting what they would like to see in photos? All I know is that I'll be suggesting tons of shit to the webmasters what I want to see.
Yes. And they'll do what they always do and ignore your requests because, on that level, they don't give a f*ck about you, only getting your money.
:lol
Ramsfan
29th August 2006, 01:51 AM
I'm not so sure about that IMO. I would imagine modelling would be like any other business out there. Most webmasters would listen to your suggestions, since.......
1. You're the paying customer. Without customers, a site is shit out of luck. You as the customer, should be the webmaster's #1 priority and reason to keep the site up and going.
2A. The more people hate your product, the less profit you'll make.
B. Bad word of mouth can get your site to shut down(Think of all of the people, who tell everyone they know, not to buy www.somesite.com because of lack of updates, shoots, videos, wardrobe and ect).
C. The looks of the models can go so far before you put all the other qualities of the site into the fold. NDN can look hot and all, but a lot of people would start to get pissed because of her non stop teasing(Her site costs WAY too much for a NN site) and would stop renewing their accounts.
^^^^^
That's a lot of shit to not give a shit about if you're the webmaster. If your product isn't good or great, NO ONE will buy it! The girl herself, can only sell so much. Your product lives by it's customers.
Pop Not Soda
29th August 2006, 02:54 AM
Think of all of the people, who tell everyone they know, not to buy www.somesite.com because of lack of updates, shoots, videos, wardrobe and ect
Broken link. They must have been doing something wrong. :lol :lol
Ramsfan
30th August 2006, 12:24 AM
It's also a not very good site. :lol
fantor
30th August 2006, 04:00 PM
peachyforums.com has Touchdown III vid and a "BUTT" load of Pattycakes other vids UP right now. There in the Teen Archive area. Check them out before they get dropped.
The Puddy Man... Fantor
fantor
30th August 2006, 05:04 PM
Well I got Touchdown III. It's ok, nothing new other then a few second's of bush. I like Touchdown II alot better. I am working the other downloads now. I am so glad I never signed up to her website. I would be very pissed off paying $20.00+ per month for what she is putting out right now. I would pay maybe $9.95 but thats about it.
The Puddy Man...Fantor
fantor
30th August 2006, 05:04 PM
OK I just got Tub Tease II. I have to give it up for this one. Excellent "Masturbation" and no dumb lip sinking to the song til the end...:-( The vid really reminded me of a good mid 90s softcore porn...:-) If Pattycake is going to keep up the "tease thing" she should stop the lip sink thing and go full on "Masturbation" in her panties non-stop. Maybe at some point she will get so horney and show the "GOODS"!!!!
The Puddy Man has Spoken.... Fantor
fantor
30th August 2006, 05:10 PM
Pattycake with Wine... "review" will be up in 30 if I can get it before it is shut down. I have no real intrest in the Pink Panther III vid. If anyone ealse gets it please post a review.
The Puddy Man...Fantor
fantor
30th August 2006, 05:56 PM
Pattycake with Wine?????? No. Try dark Irish beer. I fast fwd most of this vid it's just stupid. A total wast of time. Next....:-(
The Puddy Man has Spoken.... Fantor
aeropilot
30th August 2006, 07:37 PM
Pattycake with Wine?????? No. Try dark Irish beer. I fast fwd most of this vid it's just stupid. A total wast of time. Next....:-(
The Puddy Man has Spoken.... Fantor
:lol
All hail the 14 year old in our midst. What a lot of time you must have to waste you little :ban:
Not failure, but low aim, is a crime.
-James Russell Lowell.
moonboy
26th December 2007, 02:22 PM
Yeah...even if you're fucking her.....unless she does the laundry, too.
:lol:lol:lol:lol
axl_21wb
10th January 2008, 02:28 PM
thanks please
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.